HOUSTON GRADUATE SCHOOL OF THEOLOGY
HOW MUCH, O GOD?
A TERM PAPER SUBMITTED FOR
OT-612 OLD TESTAMENT HISTORICAL BOOKS
BY
ELAINE A. HIGGINS
HOUSTON, TEXAS
JULY 16, 2002
Chapter
1...... Introduction
....................................................................................................... 1
2...... Israel
Crosses the Jordan ............................................................................. 1
Summary of Passage
Information Available from the Text
3...... Estimation
of Quantities ............................................................................... 4
Method of Calculation
Estimation of Input Parameters
Results
Evaluation of Uncertainty
4...... Application ........................................................................................................... 7
REFERENCES
...................................................................................................................... 8
Table
In a vision at the
conclusion of the book of Daniel, the prophet sees a man standing on the bank
of the river asking the man dressed in linen who was above the waters of the
river, “How long will it be until the end of these wonders?” In that instance, Daniel’s revelation
concerned the end time. However, even
prior to Daniel’s eschatological vision, the Bible records a number of
miraculous events, many of them associated with water. Predicting how long wonders will continue is
beyond the scope of this paper. Rather,
this paper will try to quantify the amount of water involved in one of God’s
miracles: how much water did God heap
up to enable the Children of Israel to cross the Jordan and enter the promised
land?
As described in
Joshua, chapters 3 and 4, the Israelites entered Canaan by crossing the Jordan
opposite of Jericho, 20 miles south of Adam during the time of grain
harvest. The time of grain harvest
would have been during the months of April to May when the runoff from the
spring rains and the snowmelt from the mountains would have been at a yearly
high.[1] The priests carried the ark and entered the
edge of the waters. At this time the
waters were cut off and the priests proceeded to dry ground in the center of
the Jordan. The waters downstream of
the crossing flowed south to the Dead sea, while “the waters flowing down from
above stood and rose up in one heap at Adam” (Joshua 3:16). The nation of Israel crossed the river after
which 12 men went back into the river where the priests were standing, each
selected a stone, and carried it back to the opposite bank. When priests came out and their feet touched
the opposite shore, the waters of the Jordan returned.
In order to
estimate the volume of water that was piled up at Adam, two major pieces of
information are needed: the flow rate
of the Jordan during this time of year and the length of time it would take the
Israelites to cross the river.
The text must be
examined for clues to help approximate the values used to estimate the volume
of water heaped up at Adam. Joshua,
chapters 3 and 4, provides helpful information regarding i) the flow rate of
the Jordan at the time of the stoppage, ii) the number of persons making the
crossing, and iii) the procedure for crossing.
Considerations for estimating these values are discussed below.
The flow rate of
the Jordan river varies throughout the year based on rainfall and snowmelt;
therefore, the time of year of the crossing must be determined, if
possible. Three separate
references indicate that Israel entered
Canaan in the spring or when the water was high: “the Jordan overflows all its banks all the days of harvest”
(Joshua 3:15), “the waters of the Jordan returned to their place, and went over
all its banks as before” (Joshua 4:18); and “the people came up from the Jordan
on the tenth of the first month” (Joshua 4:19). Therefore, the value selected for calculating the volume of water
piled up at Adam should be within the upper range of possible reasonable values
for the flow rate of the Jordan.
The size of the
group crossing into Canaan is not specifically stated; however, the passage
emphasizes that the entire nation was involved by using such terms as “all the
sons of Israel,” “all the nation,” “all Israel,” and “twelve men from the
tribes of Israel, one man for each tribe.”
Thus, the number of persons crossing the Jordan would have been very
large. A rough estimate may be obtained
from the census taken by Moses in Numbers, chapter 26, which records a total of
600,000 fighting men over the age of 20 years.
The time taken to
cross the river would be directly related to the configuration of the people as
they crossed (e.g. single file, ten abreast, en masse). The Bible provides only a vague allusion to
this factor. However, a careful reading
reveals that, at a minimum, the crossing was intended to be an orderly event,
possibly suggesting some sort of linear arrangement. This is attested to in Joshua’s command to maintain a minimum
distance from the ark of the covenant of approximately one-half mile[2]
in order that they would know the way in which to proceed, because they have
not “passed this way before” (Joshua 3:5).
Contrary to implications of this verse, some scholars suggest that the
necessity for reminding the people to proceed in an orderly fashion arose from
the fact that crossing the Jordan was a traditional rite of the Passover. In this view, the reminder from Joshua to
follow the ark of the covenant would have been an emendation by the
Deuteronomistic historian near the time of Josiah.[3]
The volume of
water heaped up at Adam has been approximated based on the information
available from the biblical text as discussed above and other published data
using the following equation:
V
= Qcross * tcross (Equation
1)
Where: V = volume
of water heaped up at Adam, cubic feet
Qcross
= flow rate of river at the time of crossing, cubic feet per minute
tcross
= time for nation of Israel to cross river, minute
Determination of the river flow rate during the spring flood
(Qcross) and the time for the nation of Israel to cross the river (tcross)
are discussed below.
The flow rate of
the Jordan river during a normal spring has been estimated based on information
regarding a historical flow into the Dead Sea of 4.6E10 cubic feet per year.[4] Given the changes in population and land use
during the last 50 years, recent estimates of yearly inflow are much lower and
would not reflect the flow rate experienced by Israel. No data were available for the actual spring
total; therefore, a value of 50 percent of the total yearly flow was assumed to
occur during the four month period of February, March, April, and May (i.e.,
0.5 x 4.2E10 = 2.1E10 cubic feet per year).
Calculations are also summarized on Table 1. Applying the appropriate conversion factors yields an estimated
instantaneous flow rate (Qcross) of 120,000 cubic feet per
minute. Compare this value for the
Jordan to a flow rate of approximately 900,000 cubic feet per minute for the
West Fork of the San Jacinto River near Humble, Texas, on July 15, 2002, after
two days of significant rainfall.[5]
The other input
value needed to estimate the volume of water piled up at Adam is the time for
the crossing. Little actual information
is known for this variable; therefore, several assumptions must be made to
derive an estimate for the time of crossing (tcross). This parameter requires an estimate of the
number of persons making the journey, the formation in which they traveled, and
an estimate of their speed.
First, the number
of persons must be estimated. Say the
number of adult males of fighting age represents one-fifth of the population,
then the total population would have been 3 million (i.e., 600,000 x 5), not
accounting for young ones who might be carried by their parents. Assuming that the children of Israel
traversed the dry Jordan in a column of 40 persons abreast with each person 3
feet behind his nearest neighbor, the line of entrants into Jordan would have
been 43 miles long [i.e., (3 million x 3)/(40 x 5,280 feet/mile)]. Note that this merely represents the
hypothetical formation of 3 million persons as if they were arrayed in a
line. Realistically, under the scenario
described here, they would have massed at the river’s edge and would have
entered the dry riverbed 40 at a time.
A reasonable walking rate for people accustomed to desert travel would
be 3 miles per hour, especially because the text tells us that “the people
hurried and crossed” (Joshua 4:10).
This gives a total time for traversing the dry river (tcross)
of 14 hours (i.e., 43 miles/3 miles per hour), just manageable in one day,
assuming that the crossing started at daybreak and continued until sunset.
Substituting the
estimated values for the river flow rate and the time of crossing into Equation
1 yields a total volume heaped up at Adam of 100 million cubic feet of water
(i.e., 120,000 cubic feet per minute x 14 hours x 60 minutes per hour). Thus, the waters of the Jordan River piled
up 20 miles north of the crossing to Jericho were approximately equivalent to
the volume of two very wet Astrodomes.[6]
A natural
explanation for this event would involve an earthquake which could have
dislodged a sufficient quantity of the soft limestone rock common in the area
to block the Jordan for long enough for the children of Israel to cross the
Jordan. Afterwards, the river would
quickly have eroded away a new channel to continue to the Dead Sea. During recorded earthquakes in 1267 and
1927, the river was reportedly held back for 16 to 21 hours, respectively,[7]
comparable with the time estimated here.
Each of the values
in the calculations described in this paper have been justified on the basis of
the biblical account, current available information about the locale, or
engineering judgment. Nevertheless,
uncertainty remains about the final estimate.
Calculations for the base discussed in detail in this paper are provided
on Table 1. In addition, the water
volume for four alternative cases has also been calculated. The relationship between the variables and
the result are linear, so the impact of changing the input values one at a time
is relatively uncomplicated. For
example, if the actual population was one-tenth the estimated value, the time
to cross would take one-tenth as long and the final calculated volume would be
one-tenth as large (i.e., 10 million cubic feet). Conversely, walking in a column 20 persons abreast would double
the ultimate outcome of the analysis.
Regardless of the adjustments made to the input values, the result is a
very great quantity of water.
Evaluating the
quantities involved in God’s miraculous acts helps to make the biblical account
more concrete and understandable. The
volume of the water held back to permit the Hebrews to cross into Canaan offers
a prime example of the way in which Yahweh broke into history to accomplish His
sovereign will for Israel. Although
natural explanations have been advanced for this miracle, the timing was
certainly in God’s hand and used for His ultimate purpose in salvation
history.
Hertzing, J. “Gulf Coast Salt Domes and Salt Caverns: Storage Caverns” (Encinitas, California:
Solution Mining Research Institute), http://www.solutionmining.org/
Introduction%20to%20Solution%20Mining/Salt.htm.
New American Standard
Bible. 1999, ed. Kenneth
Barker. Grand Rapids: Zondervan Publishing House.
The New Interpreter's
Bible: General Articles &
Introduction, Commentary, & Reflections for Each Book of the Bible,
Including the Apocryphal/Deuterocanonical Books, 12 vols., Nashville: Abingdon Press, c1994-.
Soggin, J.A.
1974. Joshua: A Commentary. Philadelphia: The Westminster Press.
Vengosh, A., E. Farber, U. Shavit, R. Holtzman, M. Segal, I.
Gavrieli, T. Bullen, and B. Mayer.
2001. “Tracing the Origin of
Salinity of the Jordan River,” in The
Proceedings of the 4th International Symposium on Applied Isotope Geochemistry
held in Pacific Grove, California, 25-29 June 2001 (US Geological Survey), http://www.rcamnl.wr.usgs.
gov/kinwater/vengosh.pdf.
“West Fork San Jacinto River near Humble, Monday July 14, 2002.” National Weather Service: West Gulf River Forecast Service. http://www.srh.noaa.gov/wgrfc/observation/ HMMT2obs.html.
|
|
TABLE 1 |
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CALCULATION OF
ESTIMATED VOLUME OF WATER PILED UP AT ADAM WHEN |
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
THE CHILDREN OF
ISRAEL CROSSED THE JORDAN AND ENTERED CANAAN |
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
No. of |
Flow Rate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average Annual |
Spring |
Months |
During |
|
|
Total |
Width |
Length |
|
Time to |
Volume |
No. of |
|
|
|
Case |
Flow Rate of Jordan
River |
Fraction |
in Spring |
Feb - May |
Census |
Multiplier |
Crossing |
of Line |
of Line |
Speed |
Cross |
of Water |
Astrodomes |
|
|
|
Description |
cubic meters/yr |
cubic feet/yr |
— |
— |
cu ft/min |
persons |
— |
persons |
persons |
mi |
mph |
hr |
cubic feet |
— |
|
|
Base Case |
1.2E+09* |
4.2E+10 |
0.50 |
4 |
1.2.E+05 |
6.0E+05 |
5 |
3.00E+06 |
40 |
43 |
3 |
14 |
1.04E+08 |
1.9 |
|
|
0.1 x Census |
1.2E+09* |
4.2E+10 |
0.50 |
4 |
1.2.E+05 |
6.0E+04 |
5 |
3.00E+05 |
40 |
4 |
3 |
1 |
1.04E+07 |
|
|
|
0.5 x Line |
1.2E+09* |
4.2E+10 |
0.50 |
4 |
1.2.E+05 |
6.0E+05 |
5 |
3.00E+06 |
20 |
85 |
3 |
28 |
2.09E+08 |
|
|
|
1.5 x Spring |
1.2E+09* |
4.2E+10 |
0.75 |
4 |
1.8.E+05 |
6.0E+05 |
5 |
3.00E+06 |
40 |
43 |
3 |
14 |
1.57E+08 |
|
|
|
0.66 x Speed |
1.2E+09* |
4.2E+10 |
0.50 |
4 |
1.2.E+05 |
6.0E+05 |
5 |
3.00E+06 |
40 |
43 |
2 |
21 |
1.57E+08 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*A. Vengosh
et al., "Tracing the origin of Salinity of the Jordan River," in
Proceedings of the 4th International Symposium on Applied Isotope
Geochemistry |
||||||||||||||
|
|
held in Pacific Grove, California, 25-29 June 2001 (US
Geological Survey), http://www.rcamnl.wr.usgs.gov/kinwater/vengosh.pdf. |
|
|
||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1] Grain harvest took place in April and May per note on Joshua 3:15. New American Standard Bible, ed. Kenneth Barker (Grand Rapids: Zondervan Publishing House, 1999).
[2] 2,000 cubits. Joshua 3:4.
[3] The New Interpreter's Bible: General Articles & Introduction, Commentary, & Reflections for Each Book of the Bible, Including the Apocryphal/Deuterocanonical Books (Nashville: Abingdon Press, c1994-), 3:599.
[4]
Corresponding to 1,200 million cubic meters per year. A. Vengosh et al., “Tracing the Origin of Salinity of the Jordan
River,” in The Proceedings of the 4th
International Symposium on Applied Isotope Geochemistry held in Pacific Grove,
California, 25-29 June 2001 (US Geological Survey), http://wwwrcamnl.wr.usgs.gov/kinwater/vengosh.pdf.
[5] “West Fork San Jacinto River near Humble, Monday July 14, 2002,” (National Weather Service: West Gulf River Forecast Service, 2002), http://www.srh.noaa.gov/wgrfc/observation/ HMMT2obs.html.
[6] Assuming a volume for the Houston Astrodome of 10 million barrels. J. Hertzing, “Gulf Coast Salt Domes and Salt Caverns: Storage Caverns” (Encinitas, California: Solution Mining Research Institute), http://www.solutionmining.org/Introduction%20to%20Solution %20Mining/Salt.htm.
[7] J.A. Soggin, Joshua: A Commentary (Philadelphia: The Westminster Press, 1974), 61.